Skip to content

Companion Planting Spacing

Compare nominal positions from measured usable row length, user-entered cultivar spacings, and approved whole row counts without claiming companion compatibility.

Use this result well

Inputs that matter
Measured Usable Row Length, Primary Cultivar Source Spacing, Approved Primary Rows, Second Cultivar Source Spacing, and 1 more
Output to expect
Companion Planting Spacing
  • Check the units and required inputs before comparing results.
  • Keep the assumptions with a copied result so you can reproduce the calculation later.

Choose your path

Built around the job you need to finish

Compare nominal whole positions for two independently sourced cultivar spacings across measured usable row length and approved whole row counts without claiming companion compatibility.

Home gardener comparing one mixed-row layout

See how many nominal positions fit after paths, supports and edges are excluded.

Measure usable row length and enter exact cultivar-source spacings plus approved row counts.

Gets two reproducible position counts without a built-in tomato/basil prescription.

Garden planner reviewing succession and access

Keep each cultivar/phase and usable layout boundary explicit.

Run separate scenarios as cultivars, rows, supports, reach or succession phases change.

Does not mistake a total count for an accessible or maintainable layout.

Extension, food or plant-health reviewer

Prevent folklore pairing claims from being presented as calculation truth.

Inspect source dates and exact cultivar context, then review form, airflow, disease, harvest and local evidence outside the arithmetic.

Sees an explicit no-compatibility boundary and can reject unsupported pairings.

Was this tool helpful?

Reference & details

How it works

Two independent spacing records

For each cultivar, divide measured usable row length by the exact current label or trusted-source spacing, round down to whole positions per row, and multiply by the approved whole row count.

Compatibility is outside the arithmetic

The tool contains no universal crop table and does not establish that two plants benefit one another. Reconcile exact cultivar form, support, succession, disease airflow, access, harvest and current local sources separately.

Layout verification

Compare nominal positions with the approved bed drawing and a representative physical layout; subtract paths, supports, edges and reserved zones before entering usable row length.

Updated: July 2026

Example Scenarios

Compare two independently sourced spacings without converting the result into a companion-benefit claim.

Run revised usable row lengths after reserving actual paths, reaches, supports and maintenance space.

Keep each exact cultivar, source date and succession phase as a separate saved scenario.

Common Mistakes to Avoid

Using a generic crop name as a spacing source

Copy spacing from the exact cultivar label or a current trusted source and retain its date and conditions with the scenario.

Treating nominal positions as proof of companion benefit

The arithmetic only compares positions. Review current evidence, mature form, roots, supports, disease airflow, harvest, access and local conditions separately.

FAQ

The whole-position arithmetic is reproducible from the entered measurements and spacings. Its usefulness still depends on accurate usable length, exact cultivar sources and field verification.

Positions per row are floor(usable row length in inches divided by the entered spacing), multiplied by the approved whole row count. No built-in companion or crop-spacing table is used.

Yes, 100% free with no hidden fees or registration required. All calculations run instantly in your browser with total data privacy.

Yes, you can copy results to your clipboard, export formatted Markdown summaries, or generate a print-ready report directly from the tool.

Review our methodology breakdown section below for detailed step-by-step mathematical explanations and standard reference citations.

About Companion Planting Spacing

Record one two-cultivar layout scenario from measured usable row length and independently sourced spacings. The result is a nominal position count, not a recommendation to pair the plants or a promise of yield, health, pest control, access, or food safety.