A dated API handoff containing the accepted consumer and HTTP contract, data and access boundaries, implementation/version references, bounded Tool observations, test and operational evidence, open defects, rollback route, and named owner decision.
REST API Decision Record
Coordinate one HTTP API contract from authorized purpose and consumer evidence through reproducible implementation, security, negative tests, operational controls, and named acceptance.
- • Named decision and service owners
- • Authorized problem and system boundary
- • Production, personal, regulated, confidential, licensed or secret material can exceed the permitted Tool, test or logging boundary.
- • An API that satisfies one caller can still harm other consumers, affected people, downstream systems or operators.
- • Syntactically valid documentation can drift from implemented behavior.
- • Retries, caches, concurrency or partial failures can turn an apparently simple method choice into duplicate or lost work.
Choose your path
Built around the job you need to finish
Carry one authorized HTTP API from exact consumer and data boundaries through a versioned contract, bounded developer-Tool observations, implementation/control mapping, negative and operational tests, controlled change and named acceptance.
API consumer or product owner
Know exactly what one supported task, representation, failure and compatibility promise means for affected users and client software.
Define the consumer and accessibility record, review HTTP and domain semantics, verify running examples and accept only the bounded interface/version.
Can integrate or reject the API without relying on undocumented routes, envelopes, retries or breaking behavior.
API engineer implementing the contract
Trace models, methods, validation, authorization, queries, dependencies, errors and operations to reproducible evidence.
Use non-production Tool observations, map implementation controls, run negative/integration/failure tests and retain exact build/config/test references.
Produces a reviewable implementation and recovery path without calling formatted or generated artifacts correct by default.
Security, data or operations reviewer
Verify access, data lifecycle, observability, capacity, failure, change and rollback behavior before one use is accepted.
Review threat/data boundaries and authorization matrix, reproduce risk-based tests, inspect defects/runbooks/monitoring and record acceptance or restrictions.
Named owners accept one environment/use or keep exact defects, restrictions and dates open.
Authoritative checks for this workflow
Outputs and checklists are planning aids. Review the linked current authorities and the records, terms, instructions, and requirements that apply to your exact situation before a consequential decision.
- RFC 9110 — HTTP SemanticsInternet Engineering Task Force / RFC Editor · Current Internet Standards Track semantics for resources, methods, status codes, representations, caching, retries and intermediaries; it does not prescribe one route, envelope, identifier, pagination or deletion design.
- OpenAPI Specification 3.2.0OpenAPI Initiative / Linux Foundation · Current language-agnostic HTTP API description standard for human and machine consumers; a valid description is not evidence that an implementation or client conforms.
- RFC 9457 — Problem Details for HTTP APIsInternet Engineering Task Force / RFC Editor · Current standard error-detail option and security-disclosure boundary; it does not require one universal error envelope or replace domain-specific formats.
- OWASP API Security Top 10 — 2023OWASP Foundation · Current API-specific awareness route emphasizing object/function/property authorization, resource use, inventory and unsafe downstream consumption; selected requirements and tests remain separate.
- Secure Software Development Framework 1.1 — NIST SP 800-218National Institute of Standards and Technology · Official secure-development practices across organizational preparation, protection, production and vulnerability response; Tool completion cannot substitute for accountable lifecycle evidence.
- Shifting the Balance of Cybersecurity Risk — Secure by Design and DefaultCybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency and partners · Official manufacturer responsibility, secure-default, transparency and leadership context supporting product/operations ownership rather than shifting security configuration entirely to consumers.