Develop a short story through focused drafting, purposeful feedback and revision, then prepare the exact file and materials required by a chosen recipient.
Define the situation, viewpoint and change you want to explore. If working to a prompt, workshop or market, record its current length and format requirements. Decide what kind of feedback you want before circulating a draft.
Write a draft that lets you read the whole piece as a sequence. Explore the opening, consequential choices and ending, and note research questions that need resolution. Count the actual text with Word Counter when a length limit applies.
Share the version and the questions readers should address, such as where motivation became unclear or an ending felt unearned. Agree on the feedback format and timing. Separate a reader’s observation from their proposed solution.
Choose the structural changes first, then review language and rhythm. Read aloud or listen to a reading if useful. If comparing dialogue use, classify the same sample into non-overlapping dialogue and narrative words and use the share as description alongside close reading.
Recheck whether the recipient is accepting work, its word-count method, allowed file types, anonymity rules, rights and simultaneous-submission policy. Export and reopen the story, check the required cover material and keep the submitted version and confirmation in your own record.
Count words in the actual draft and compare them with the selected recipient’s method and limit. · Count words in the final manuscript for a cross-check against the recipient’s stated counting method after revisions.
Describe manually classified dialogue and narrative shares without using a target percentage as a quality score.
Loading your checklist…
Strange Horizons provides a concrete example of market-specific instructions, including file, anonymity and simultaneous-submission requirements. Read the current page for a live submission; other recipients can differ.
Give readers the version, purpose and questions, and ask for passage-level observations.
| Question | Useful response |
|---|---|
| What changed? | Describe the story’s apparent movement |
| Where was meaning unclear? | Identify a passage and the reading it produced |
| What did the ending leave? | Describe the effect rather than prescribing a rewrite |
Word totals and category shares describe the draft. They cannot establish emotional effect, voice consistency or acceptance likelihood.
A reader’s confusion may be useful evidence even when their suggested rewrite does not fit your intention.
Submission windows, limits and portal requirements can change.