Microinverter and String Proposal Comparison
Compare two actual inverter proposals using quoted costs, modeled annual energy, self-use and realizable export value; show the incremental cost and benefit.
Use this result well
- Inputs that matter
- Whole-system proposals, Comparison horizon (whole years), Sources and assumptions
- Output to expect
- Compare actual inverter-system proposals
- Check the units and required inputs before comparing results.
- Keep the assumptions with a copied result so you can reproduce the calculation later.
Related Tools
Tools you might need next
Simple in-browser notepad with auto-save. Write quick notes that persist in your browser. Download as text file. No signup needed.
Value self-used solar and exported energy with their own rates, realizable credits and additional charges; retain the actual tariff assumptions.
Compare PV DC/AC nameplate ratio, simultaneous AC watts and VA, timed peak ratings and the actual battery-voltage and current envelope.
Reference & details
How it works
Updated September 2026
How it works
Updated September 2026Compare actual inverter-system proposals
Compare two whole-system proposals using their quoted costs, same-period modeled generation, self-use share, export value and recurring costs. Keep weather, capacity and tariff assumptions comparable.
Annual energy value = generation × [self-use fraction × avoided-import rate + export fraction × export rate × realizable credit fraction]; annual net = energy value − recurring costs.Updated: September 2026
Example Scenarios
Try this example to see the calculation, then enter actual documented values and preserve the measurement conditions. A failed or unresolved comparison is part of the record.
→ String proposal: $367.50 higher net benefit
FAQ
About Microinverter and String Proposal Comparison
Compare two whole-system proposals using their quoted costs, same-period modeled generation, self-use share, export value and recurring costs. Keep weather, capacity and tariff assumptions comparable.