Review the complete line with a guide
Identify the entrance, exposure, confined sections, exit and alternatives using current route information. Record unresolved questions, including fall consequences and the ability to retreat before entry.
Review a steep ski objective with a guide, including avalanche problems, exposure, communication and retreat options, with linked primary references.
Identify the entrance, exposure, confined sections, exit and alternatives using current route information. Record unresolved questions, including fall consequences and the ability to retreat before entry.
Read the current bulletin and discuss how its avalanche problems affect the proposed aspects and elevations. A failed attempt to trigger snow with a ski cut does not establish that the slope is stable.
Have the guide identify how the party would communicate, regroup and manage the line. Discuss an alternate objective before reaching the entrance. If the plan depends on skills or protection the group does not possess, choose a different objective.
Compare the on-site conditions and visibility with the plan. Resolve uncertainty with the guide before exposure; turn back when the entry, snow, exit or group capacity does not support the agreed plan. Debrief decisions after returning.
Loading your checklist…
Ski cuts involve exposure and have limited application to shallow instabilities. Avalanche.org describes greater risk and ineffectiveness for deeper instabilities; a cut is not a general slope-clearance test.
Use the local forecast as an input to route assessment, along with current observations and professional guidance.
Discuss each point while alternatives remain available.
| Topic | Question |
|---|---|
| Exit | Is the complete line and exit understood? |
| Exposure | What happens if someone falls or snow moves? |
| Alternative | Where can the group change plans before committing? |
The ability to make a turn does not resolve the consequences of falling, an avalanche or a blocked exit.